Key takeaways
Texas became the first US state to add Bitcoin exposure to a state-managed investment portfolio by purchasing about $5 million of BlackRock’s IBIT ETF through its newly created Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.
SB 21 shifted Texas from a crypto mining hub to an active digital asset investor. The bill authorizes the state comptroller to buy, hold and sell Bitcoin using a legislature-approved $10-million fund.
The initial allocation is small relative to Texas’ overall investment portfolio, which holds more than $667 million in S&P 500 ETFs. This signals a cautious and exploratory step.
Texas’ move stands apart from federal crypto programs, which deal mainly with seized assets. Texas made a proactive and budgeted investment.
Texas took an unprecedented step in the US when it added Bitcoin (BTC) exposure to its state-managed investment portfolio. The state invested about $5 million in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) through its newly created Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. The move shows how a state can treat digital assets as part of its long-term investment strategy.
This article examines how Texas shifted from a mining center to a Bitcoin reserve state, how Senate Bill 21 (SB 21) changed its approach to digital assets and why the move suggests a broader shift in government policy.
From mining hub to Bitcoin reserve
Texas has long been a major center for Bitcoin mining because of its favorable energy prices and supportive regulations. Until 2025, however, the state itself did not own any Bitcoin.
That changed in November 2025 when the Texas Treasury Safekeeping Trust Company purchased about $5 million of the IBIT exchange-traded fund (ETF), according to the Texas Blockchain Council. The purchase was made under SB 21, a law passed in June 2025 that created the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. Official transaction records have not yet been released, but the law clearly authorizes such investments.
Senate Bill 21, officially called the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and Investment Act, created a special fund separate from the state treasury. This fund is managed by the Texas Treasury Safekeeping Trust Company under the same regulations that apply to other state investments.
The law allows the state comptroller to buy, hold, manage and sell Bitcoin using money specifically approved by the legislature. Lawmakers set aside $10 million for this purpose.
On Nov. 20, 2025, the state reportedly used half of that amount ($5 million) to buy shares of BlackRock’s IBIT Bitcoin ETF. This is said to be the first time any US state has directly purchased Bitcoin exposure with public funds.
The state’s investment portfolio holds about $667 million in a large S&P 500 ETF and $34 million in another fund. If confirmed, the $5-million Bitcoin ETF position is small by comparison. It appears to be a cautious first step rather than a major change in strategy.
Did you know? An Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund was one of the earliest government-linked institutions to hold a Bitcoin ETF.
How SB 21 changes Texas’ approach to digital assets before this law
Before SB 21, Texas’ focus on crypto was centered on mining, grid participation and economic incentives. SB 21 shifts the state from simply hosting the industry to becoming an investor itself.
Senator Charles Schwertner, the bill’s main sponsor, described Bitcoin as the best-performing asset of the past decade. He argued that Texas should have the option to include it, just as it can invest in land or gold. Supporters of the bill emphasized long-term diversification and protection against inflation, not short-term price gains.
Some analysts see Texas’ move as further evidence that major institutions are becoming more comfortable with Bitcoin ETFs. Others warn that Bitcoin’s high volatility creates added risks for public money and that governments must be especially careful when investing taxpayer funds in such assets. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas also noted that IBIT is now reportedly held by an Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund.
Why this looks like a shift in government crypto policy
State governments in the US have generally viewed Bitcoin as either a regulatory issue or a factor affecting the power grid. SB 21 shifts that view by treating Bitcoin as an allowable long-term store of value that can be held and managed like traditional mutual funds. This is not an endorsement of Bitcoin’s price or value. It is a reclassification of how the asset is governed.
Texas’ Bitcoin reserve differs from current federal digital asset programs. Federal efforts, such as the proposed US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve or the Digital Asset Stockpile, focus on cryptocurrency seized through law enforcement actions. By contrast, Texas’ reserve is funded directly by an act of the legislature and managed under the same fiduciary standards as other state investments.
This difference carries weight. Texas is making an active and budgeted investment decision rather than passively accepting forfeited assets. However, the move does not create national policy because no federal law currently authorizes Bitcoin as a reserve asset.
Several US states have explored similar ideas, but most remain in the planning stage. States such as Wyoming and Oklahoma have proposed legislation for digital asset reserves, but Texas is the only state to have completed an actual purchase.
Did you know? Harvard Endowment made a $443-million bet on BlackRock’s IBIT. The investment accounts for about 20% of Harvard’s reported US-listed public equity holdings.
What Texas’ Bitcoin reserve move does not mean
Setting clear boundaries is important to avoid overstating the significance of Texas’ decision. Texas is not making Bitcoin legal tender or accepting it as payment for taxes, and it has not shifted its investment portfolio in any significant way toward digital assets.
The move also does not create a binding precedent for the federal government or other states, nor does it signal a unified national policy. Most states and federal agencies continue to approach digital assets with caution, citing concerns about price volatility, consumer protection and energy use.
Did you know? Analysts increasingly compare BTC reserves to traditional gold reserves. Bitcoin’s verifiable supply, transparent onchain traceability and fixed issuance make it an unconventional but measurable counterpart to gold.
Policy risks and open questions
Including Bitcoin in the state’s investment scheme exposes public officials to new forms of risk. Large price declines could generate political criticism, especially during budget reviews. Research on public fund management shows that high volatility can lead to questions about whether officials made appropriate decisions.
SB 21 requires adequate record-keeping and fiduciary oversight, but specific operational rules such as rebalancing triggers, volatility limits, exit plans or any intention to move from ETF holdings to direct Bitcoin custody remain undisclosed.
This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.
